Search Results for "Surplus Land Determination"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Ejectment Case Under Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953. Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 25 as Revenue Court Order Was Without Jurisdiction Due to Absence of Landlord-Tenant Relationship and Invalid Sale of Trust Property.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute over ejectment of a tenant from agricultural land. The appellants, claiming to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Order. Petitioner's father's written statement cannot be used to declare petitioner surplus holder without proper notice and opportunity.

The petitioner, Vithal s/o Venkatrao alias Yenkaji Sejul, a resident of Abegaon, Taluka Majalgaon, District Beed, filed a writ petition challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Land Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 12(6) of the Act.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landholder Babasaheb Balwant Bawane, challenged the order dated 30th April 1993 passed by the Chairman, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...