Search Results for "Suo Moto Revision"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Forfeiture for Breach of Grant Condition. Transfer of Granted Land Without Prior Permission Void Under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The present writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Shamjibhai Laljibhai Koli (Gohil) challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Land Grant Cancellation Orders, Directs Authorities to Grant Land as Per 1992 Order Under Bombay Land Revenue Code

The Gujarat High Court allowed a special civil application challenging the cancellation of land grant to the petitioners -- The petitioners' father ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petition in Cooperative Society Recovery Case Due to Lack of Bona Fides. Petitioners Failed to Repay Loan or Deposit Amount Under One Time Settlement Despite Recovery Certificate Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, Pravin Laxmanrao Chakole and Dipali Pravin Chakole, were borrowers and members of the New Subhedar Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd., ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Land Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 12(6) of the Act.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landholder Babasaheb Balwant Bawane, challenged the order dated 30th April 1993 passed by the Chairman, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Quashed as Issued After 16 Years.

The petitioner, Shivram A. Galbe, was a landholder in village Devegaon, Tq. Pathri, Dist. Parbhani. He filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...