Search Results for "Subjective satisfaction"

867 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 867 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Lack of Material to Show Harm or Danger. Petitioner's involvement in two theft cases insufficient to justify externment under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 as there was no evidence of witnesses unwilling to depose.

The petitioner, Pankaj Prakash Shimpi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the externment proceedings ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Under Section 56(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Orders set aside as show cause notices failed to specify the period of proposed externment and the authority did not consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(b) of the Bombay Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...