Search Results for "Section 48(1) withdrawal"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Revenue Appeals Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Service Tax Demand, Arguing University's Activities Are Commercial and Taxable. Court Examines Educational Institution Exemption Under Finance Act, 1994.

This intra-court appeal arose from a Single Judge's order quashing a show cause notice and demand for service tax issued to Rajiv Gandhi University of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Protection in Service for Employee with Invalid Caste Certificate. Employee who gave up challenge to caste invalidation order granted reinstatement without back wages or reservation benefits.

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Ramaji Mahisbadwe, was employed with National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) based on a caste certificate clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions. Order of CEO SRA Upheld as Developer Found to Have Violated Terms of Agreement and Failed to Complete Project.

The petitioner, a company engaged as a developer for a slum rehabilitation project on a property owned by a cooperative housing society, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...