Search Results for "Section 342 CrPC"

111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Criminal Complaint Dismissal Case — Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Must Be Complete Before Dismissal Under Section 203 CrPC. Magistrate's failure to examine witnesses after ordering inquiry under Section 202 CrPC renders dismissal under Section 203 CrPC invalid.

The case arises from a criminal complaint filed by the first respondent under Section 200 CrPC alleging offences under Sections 323, 342, 500, 504, 50...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in State Appeal Against Inadequacy of Sentence Under Section 377 CrPC. Court holds that sentence of imprisonment already undergone for offence under Section 304 Part II IPC is inadequate and enhances to 5 years rigorous imprisonment.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the judgment dated 18.02.2010 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused No.2 shared common intention with accused No.1 to commit murder.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.X, Bengaluru, in S.C.No.83/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302 rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 13-year-old girl in a shop confirmed, with sentence of 7 years RI and fine.

The appellant, Arvind Bhagwant Datal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Pen...