Search Results for "Section 18"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of criminal proceedings – No violation of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 – Magistrate’s summoning order lacked reasons.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUMMONING ORDER MUST REFLECT APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL MIND. Summoning an accused is a serious matter – Magistrate must assign reasons – Non-speaking summoning order quashed

Acts & Sections Discussed: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 482, Section 468(2), Section 202 Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 194...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on MSMED Act to Larger Bench. Balancing statutory remedies with writ jurisdiction: Supreme Court deliberates over MSMED Act provisions and alternative remedies.

The Supreme Court of India examines whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable against an order passed by the Micro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets MSMED Act for Dispute Resolution Rights. Clarifying whether unregistered MSMEs under Section 8 can invoke arbitration under Section 18.

Remedies Under the MSMED Act, 2006 Unrestricted by Prior Registration Whether an enterprise not registered under Section 8 of the Micro, Small, and M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Invalidates Ex Parte Arbitration Awards; Upholds Principles of Party Autonomy

Existence of Arbitration Agreement: Whether the purported arbitration agreement dated 01.04.1957 was valid and enforceable. Unilateral Appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – Lack of Prima Facie Case – Mandatory Compliance Under Section 195(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 353 and 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, were quashed due to the absence of a written complaint by a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Royal Traders' Plea for Waiver in SARFAESI Act Appeal. The court reinforces the necessity of pre-deposit compliance under Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act and dismisses petitions seeking waiver.

The judgment clarifies the scope of Section 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, particularly the conditions for pre-deposit waivers by borrowers appealin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Validates DRAT Order for Pre-Deposit Calculation in Secured Asset Auction Dispute. Pre-deposit determination upheld as per SARFAESI Act, focusing on "debt due" over auction value.

The Bombay High Court upheld the DRAT's order mandating a pre-deposit based on "debt due" when the measures under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Conviction Modified: Appellant’s Acquittal & Sentencing Reduced for Assault on Public Servant" "Minor offence distinction under IPC 353 and 186 clarified, leading to partial acquittal and reduction of sentence."

  1. Background of the Case Complainant Sagar Patil, Block Development Officer, relieved Appellant/Punam Aundhakar (Accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conditional Guarantee Found Inoperative in Absence of CDR Approval. No life to a contract where pre-conditions remain unmet, rules Bombay High Court.

The suit revolves around whether the Deed of Guarantee executed by the plaintiff, Mr. Deepen Arun Parekh, became operative. The court held that the gu...