Search Results for "Section 142 Customs Act"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Union of India to Appoint Visually Impaired Candidates Against Backlog Vacancies. After years of litigation, the Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure justice for visually impaired candidates denied appointments in the Civil Services Examination 2008.

The case revolves around respondent no.1, a 100% visually impaired individual, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2008 and was denie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Divorce on Ground of Desertion After 21 Years of Separation — Marriage Held to Be Dead and Irretrievably Broken Down. Long separation of 21 years and wife's failure to explain desertion established wilful desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-husband, K. Mallikarjuna, filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce from his wife, H. A....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 Due to Irretrievable Breakdown Despite Wife's Opposition. Marriage Declared Emotionally Dead After 16 Years of Separation, with Husband Directed to Pay Rs. 25 Lakhs as Final Settlement Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

The dispute involved a husband and wife who married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and later solemnized the marriage under Hindu rites. The hus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand on Scrap Generated During Car Manufacturing. Generation of scrap during manufacturing process is not a separate taxable event under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Premier Ltd. and New Holland Fiat (India) Pvt. Ltd. challenging show cause notices issued by the Cen...