High Court of Karnataka Allows Divorce on Ground of Desertion After 21 Years of Separation — Marriage Held to Be Dead and Irretrievably Broken Down. Long separation of 21 years and wife's failure to explain desertion established wilful desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-husband, K. Mallikarjuna, filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce from his wife, H. A. Sudha Mallikarjuna, on the ground of wilful desertion. The marriage was solemnized on 24 June 1999 at Sri Swarnambha Kalyana Mandira, Kadur Taluk. The appellant alleged that the respondent left the matrimonial home without any reasonable cause and had been living separately for over 21 years. The trial court dismissed the petition, leading to the present appeal. The High Court noted that the parties had been separated for more than 21 years and that the marriage was completely dead. The court found that the respondent had not provided any explanation for the separation and that the appellant had proved the ground of desertion. The court also observed that even if desertion was not strictly proved, the long separation itself indicated an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the trial court's judgment, and granted a decree of divorce.

Headnote

A) Hindu Marriage Act - Divorce - Desertion - Section 13(1)(ib) - Wilful Desertion - The appellant-husband sought divorce on the ground that the respondent-wife deserted him without reasonable cause. The trial court dismissed the petition. On appeal, the High Court held that the long separation of 21 years and the wife's failure to provide any explanation for the separation constituted wilful desertion. The court noted that the marriage was dead and no purpose would be served by keeping the parties tied. Held that the appellant is entitled to a decree of divorce. (Paras 1-10)

B) Hindu Marriage Act - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Long Separation - The court observed that the parties have been living separately for more than 21 years, indicating that the marriage has irretrievably broken down. The court held that even if the ground of desertion is not strictly proved, the long separation itself is a ground for divorce. (Paras 1, 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-husband is entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of wilful desertion by the respondent-wife under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, when the parties have been living separately for over 21 years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and decree dated 21.1.2012 in M.C. No.10/2003 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and Principal JMFC, Tarikere, is set aside. The petition filed under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is allowed and the marriage between the appellant and respondent is dissolved by a decree of divorce.

Law Points

  • Desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Long separation as evidence of desertion
  • Wilful desertion
  • Condonation of desertion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (11) 18

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.4314/2012 (MC)

2021-11-16

B. Veerappa, K.S. Hemalekha

Sri B. Bopanna (for appellant), Sri C. Sadashiva (for respondent)

K. Mallikarjuna

H. A. Sudha Mallikarjuna

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition on ground of desertion

Remedy Sought

Appellant-husband sought decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Filing Reason

Alleged wilful desertion by respondent-wife since shortly after marriage

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the petition in M.C. No.10/2003 on 21.1.2012

Issues

Whether the respondent-wife deserted the appellant-husband without reasonable cause for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition? Whether the long separation of 21 years constitutes irretrievable breakdown of marriage entitling the appellant to divorce?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the respondent left the matrimonial home without any reasonable cause and has been living separately for over 21 years, amounting to wilful desertion. Respondent did not provide any explanation for the separation and opposed the divorce.

Ratio Decidendi

The long separation of 21 years and the wife's failure to provide any explanation for the separation constitute wilful desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage is dead and irretrievably broken down, and no purpose would be served by keeping the parties tied.

Judgment Excerpts

It is unfortunate that both husband and wife are residing separately for more than 21 years. The marriage is totally dead and even nothing is gained by trying to keep the parties tied for ever to a marriage that in fact has ceased to exist.

Procedural History

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in M.C. No.10/2003 before the Senior Civil Judge and Principal JMFC, Tarikere, seeking divorce on the ground of desertion. The trial court dismissed the petition on 21.1.2012. The appellant then filed the present Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 13(1)(ib), 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Exemption from Personal Appearance for Accused Director in CBI Case Due to Business Hardship. Section 205 CrPC Discretion Exercised to Balance Trial Progress and Accused's Convenience.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Rs. 25 Lakh Compensation in Matrimonial Misappropriation Case. Upholding a woman’s right to her stridhan, the Supreme Court reverses a Kerala High Court ruling, ordering compensation for misappropriation of gold.