Search Results for "Section 130"

802 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 802 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Society's Writ Petitions Against Unauthorized Construction by Members. Dispute Between Society and Member Regarding Unauthorized Construction and Possession is Barred from Civil Court Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, The Manglorian Garden Homes Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed three writ petitions challenging the orders of the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under KCOCA — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Against Petitioners. Court Held That Mere Presence at Scene or Association with Co-Accused Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Offences Under Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act, 2000.

The judgment pertains to three criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...