Search Results for "Section 124 Trade Marks Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 124 Trade Marks Act"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark Registration for 'ABACUS' in Educational Services — Petitioner's Prior Use and Reputation Established. The Court held that the mark 'ABACUS' is descriptive and not inherently distinctive, but the petitioner had acquired secondary meaning through long and extensive use since 1987.

8 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Abacus Montessori School, filed a rectification petition seeking removal of the trademark registration No. 1586733 in Class 41 for 'AB...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

13 Jul 2026

The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ad-Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action for Footwear Design — Registered Design Not Infringed Due to Lack of Novelty. Court Restrains Defendants from Passing Off Footwear Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Unregistered Get-Up Under Common Law.

6 Mar 2012

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Jasco Rubbers and Manpasand Footwear, and the defendants, Asian Rubber Industries and others, over ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — No Prima Facie Case for Confusion Between 'Manugraph' and 'Simarq' or 'Ezeego' and 'La Travenues'. The court held that the marks are not deceptively similar and the goods/services are different, thus no interim relief is warranted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

15 Jun 2016

The judgment involves two suits for trademark infringement and passing off. In Suit No. 516 of 2013, the plaintiff Manugraph India Limited sought to r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case — Order Rejecting Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC for return of plaint, as the suit lacked cause of action within its territorial jurisdiction.

26 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Tata SIA Airlines Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV Letters Patent to Combine Passing Off with Infringement Cause of Action to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The court held that once jurisdiction over infringement is established, leave to combine passing off claim should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

18 Jan 2014

The Plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and Another, filed a suit for infringement of their registered trademarks, including 'UltraTech Cement', and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Set Aside Parts of Arbitral Award on Partnership Trademark Ownership. Clause 6 of 2003 Partnership Deed Excluded Trademarks, Goodwill, and Name from Partnership Assets, Vesting Them Exclusively in Two Individuals.

6 May 2015

The Bombay High Court heard two cross-petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)