Search Results for "Section 10B Deduction"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in TDS Dispute on Internet Charges Paid to Non-Resident — Payments for Telecom Connectivity Not Royalty or Fees for Technical Services. Section 40(a)(i) Disallowance Set Aside as Payments Were Not Chargeable to Tax Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited, is engaged in the development and export of computer software. For the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Revised Return Barred by Limitation Under Section 139(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessing Officer Cannot Entertain Claim Made After Expiry of Time for Filing Revised Return.

The appellant-assessee, M/s. Shriram Investments, filed a return of income on 19 November 1989 for the assessment year 1989-90 under the Income Tax Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Charitable Trust in Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Case Due to Curable Defect in Filing Audit Report. Non-Filing of Audit Report Along with Return is a Curable Defect and Rejection of Declaration Under Section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Not Sustainable.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Narayan Patkar Charitable Trust, is a registered charitable trust. It filed a belated return of income for financial year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Export Tax Exemption Case. ITAT's finding that assessee's software development services qualify as 'computer software' under Section 10B of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The present appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Department (appellants) against the order dated 19.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. The ITAT's findings on arm's length price for software development services were based on evidence and not perverse, hence no interference under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The assessee, M/s. Indigra Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed for mere disallowance of claim without finding of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.12.2016, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Sales to Other STP Units Qualify as Deemed Export Under Section 10A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that software development services provided to another STP unit, which ultimately exports the software, constitute export for deduction purposes.

The assessee, M/s. Tata Elxsi Limited, a registered Software Technology Park (STP) unit, claimed deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Original Assessment Was Based on Full Disclosure and Scrutiny.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, is engaged in the business of providing audiovisual television content, films, events, and related ...