Search Results for "Santosh Hazari compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Santosh Hazari compliance"

34 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Restores Trial Court Decree Based on Benami Transaction and Adverse Possession Findings. The Court held that the sale deed executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 1 was benami and void under Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and that the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning 13...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside First Appellate Court's Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 8 Rule 10 CPC and Abatement of Appeal. The court held that the first appellate court failed to assign reasons for reversing the trial court's findings and that the appeal abated due to non-joinder of legal representatives of deceased defendants.

9 Aug 2019

The dispute pertains to ancestral joint family property originally owned by Rau Salunkhe, who had two sons, Bapu and Bajrang. The respondent No.1, Sun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Held that the appellate court erred in dismissing the appeal for default without considering the merits, and that the suit for partition and separate possession is maintainable even if the plaintiff is not in joint possession.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction Due to Misapplication of Order 7 Rule 3 CPC — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Property Description Mismatch Without Considering Evidence of Possession and Title. The High Court held that the courts below misapplied Order 7 Rule 3 CPC as the plaintiff had established purchase and possession of the suit property.

3 Jan 2020

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from obstructing her cultivating possession over s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Suit Based on Adverse Possession and Limitation. Concurrent findings of possession and limitation reversed as courts below misapplied Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and failed to consider that the suit was barred by limitation.

17 Oct 2011

The case involves two second appeals filed by two brothers, Vijay and Yashwant Gaikwad, challenging a common judgment and decree dated 7.12.2010 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Adverse Possession Suit — Trial Court Decree Restored. First Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Remanding Suit for Filing Written Statement Despite Proper Procedure Being Followed.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for declaration of ownership based on adverse possession filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the defendant (respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.

16 Jul 2026

The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Held That Plaintiff Was Not in Possession and That Defendant Was in Possession.

25 Jun 2020

The appellant, Javarappa @ Javaraiah, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Licence Fee Dispute — Trial Court Must Decide Suit on Merits Without Being Influenced by Observations in Remand Order. Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order XLI Rules 23, 23-A, 25 CPC by Remanding Without Deciding Appeal on Merits.

9 Apr 2015

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed Regular Civil Suit No.1900/2012 (Old Special Civil Suit No.535/2008) for mandatory injunction and recovery of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Registration Orders Under Goa Mundkars Act. Concurrent findings of fact that respondent was a mundkar in possession for over 35 years upheld.

8 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Smt. Thereza Cordo, challenged the orders of the Mamlatdar of Bardez, the Additional Collector, and the Administrative Tribunal under ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)