Search Results for "SARFAESI Act"

410 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 410 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encumbrance Created by Commercial Tax Department on Mortgaged Property. Priority of Bank's Mortgage Over Statutory Charge Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Upheld.

The petitioner, Canara Bank, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Against GST Attachment of Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act and Section 31B of RDDB Act.

The petitioner, Indian Overseas Bank, a secured creditor, had extended credit facilities to Respondent No. 3, Savair Energy Limited. Upon default, the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor's Property — Maintains That Guarantor Is a 'Borrower' Under Section 2(1)(f) of SARFAESI Act and That Writ Jurisdiction Is Not Available When Alternative Statutory Remedy Exists Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

The petitioner, Mr. Latif Yusuf Manikkoth, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the possession notice issued by the Bank of ...