Search Results for "Rule 986"

98 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Whether Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction to Pass Successive Awards and Whether Claims Are Barred by Res Judicata. Challenge to Awards Confirmed by Lower Court Raises Issues of Functus Officio and Splitting of Claims under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeals arose from two arbitration awards passed by the sole arbitrator in disputes between Mysore Lamp Works Limited (appellant) and S.V. Enginee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Extension of Time to Restore Company Application in Section 10F Appeal. Extension of Time to Remove Office Objections Was Upheld as a Matter Between Applicant and Court, with Intervenor's Rights Reserved.

The dispute arose from a long-standing conflict over management and shareholding of K.C. Agro Pvt. Ltd. between the deceased, Shri Girdharlal Dalal, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.

The plaintiff, Uday Singh Deshraj Rajput, filed Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court on 11 November 2013 seeking a declaration that he wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Default Bail Plea Against Custody Extension Under Organised Crime Act. Statutory Bail Application Ignored; Extension Sought Beyond 90 Days Violates Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, an accused in a murder case under the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000, filed a writ petition challenging the order of ...