Search Results for "Rule 92(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 92(3)"

114 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal by Revenue Administration in Promotion Dispute — Respondent Lacked Minimum Marks in Mathematics and Science for VAO Promotion. Rule 12(a)(i) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules Requires Pass in SSLC with Eligibility for College Course, Which Respondent Failed to Meet.

9 Jan 2026

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Commissioner of Revenue Administration against an order of a single judge in W.P.No.3381 of 2017. The res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.

11 Nov 2024

The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Against Panchayat Development Officer and Family Members — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. FIR under Sections 13(1)(b), 13(2), and 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as no prior sanction obtained for public servant accused.

27 May 2024

The petitioners, Sri D.M. Padmanabha (a Panchayat Development Officer), his wife Smt. Bhavya, and mother Smt. Lakshmamma, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging BBMP Notices — Petitioners Claim Ownership and Possession of Residential Plots Formed by REMCO (BHEL) Co-operative Housing Society. Notices Issued Under Unspecified Provisions of Municipal Law Are Sought to Be Quashed by Petitioners Relying on Title Documents.

4 Jan 2024

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of eight writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners in al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Water Sports Activities Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 — Levy Not Ultra Vires Constitution. Court holds that water sports activities constitute 'entertainment' under Section 2(3) of the Act and that the proviso to Section 3(1) and Section 3(5A) are valid, but remits matter for determination of actual duty liability.

4 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Drishti Adventures Sports Private Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Construes Will Provisions Under Indian Succession Act to Determine Nature of Bequests. The Court Examined Whether Bequests to Daughter Were Absolute or Held in Trust for Minor Granddaughter Until Majority.

12 Dec 2006

This group of five appeals before the Bombay High Court concerned the construction of the last will and testament of one Pilloo M. Ghaswala. The testa...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)