Search Results for "Rule 68(1)"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Seeking Certificate Under Section 63AA of Gujarat Tenancy Act for Industrial Land Purchase. Rejection of Certificate Quashed as Petitioner Complied with All Conditions for Non-Agricultural Use.

The petitioner, Advance Greenfield Pvt Ltd, through its director Surendrakumar Netaram Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) IPC set aside as prosecution could not establish minority of victim.

The appellant, Maherban Hasan Babu Khan, was convicted by the Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad, for offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Self-Acquired Property. Joint Family Property Presumed Where Common Funds Used and Possession Shared.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant) seeking partition and separate possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case for Subletting and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement. Subletting of part of premises and landlord's reasonable need for property upheld by appellate court.

The respondent, Sidaramappa Kashinath Lingshetti, is the owner and landlord of a house property bearing municipal no. 351/1/2B, city survey no. 3384/4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Partner in Suit by Firm Despite Non-Compliance with Order 30 Rule 4 CPC — No Amendment of Plaint Required for Adding Partner as Co-Plaintiff. Partner of a firm can be added as co-plaintiff without amending plaint as firm is not a separate legal entity.

The appellant, Manohar Kashinath Vyawahare, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing his application for...