Search Results for "Rule 636"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Property by Co-operative Bank Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Auction Sale Confirmed Despite Alleged Irregularities as Petitioner Failed to Prove Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, M/s. Priyesh Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the auction sale of its property by the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Rape and Murder Case. Judicial Confession and Last Seen Theory Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted as 'Rarest of Rare'.

The case involves the ghastly rape and murder of two children aged 10 and 7 years. On 29 October 2010, Mohanakrishnan picked up the children from outs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The appellant, Aravind S/o Krishnaji Kulkarni, filed Regular Second Appeal No.161/2002 against the judgment and decree dated 4.9.2001 passed in R.A.No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Sets Aside Dismissal of Election Petition for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Election Petition Granted as Tribunal Failed to Consider Sufficient Cause for Absence Under Section 151 CPC.

The appellant, Mr. K. Krishnaraj Hegde, filed an election petition under Section 21 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation (Election) Act 1979 before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Central Excise Appeal Limitation Case — Commissioner (Appeals) Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 60 Days Under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed beyond 90 days from order date cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, M/s Sheetal Enterprises, a manufacturer of industrial lubricants, availed benefit of Nil rate of duty for export under Rules 13 and 14...