Search Results for "Rule 18A"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Nursing Student Seeking Admit Card for Examination. Court Directs University to Issue Hall Ticket and College to Permit Continued Studies Despite Attendance Issues.

The petitioner, Jennifer A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. She...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AICTE's 'No Admission' Order Against Engineering College for Violation of Natural Justice. AICTE's Decision Set Aside as Institution Had Prior Approvals and Was Denied Hearing Despite Supreme Court Directions.

The petitioners, Lokmanya Tilak Jankalyan Shikshan Sanstha's Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery Case. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, finding no grounds for interference.

The petitioners, Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited and two individuals, were original respondents in an arbitration proceeding initiated by New ...