Search Results for "Residence Criteria"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for MBBS Admission in State Quota. NEET-UG 2013 Rules Requiring SSC and HSC from Maharashtra Institution Are Valid and Not Ultra Vires Articles 14, 15, 21, 29(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shubham Gaddalay, a minor represented by his mother Dr. Sunanda Gaddalay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.

The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute. Court upholds award based on settlement agreement and finds no grounds for interference under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Suratsingh Chaudhary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitration award...