Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1015 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1015 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Uncle for Rape of Minor Niece in Rape Case — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient. The court confirmed 12 years RI under Section 376 IPC for repeated sexual assault on a 15-year-old girl entrusted to his care.

The appellant, Tulshiram Babasaheb Mulik, an ex-military man employed as a watchman, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Shriram Gondchar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur, in Sessions Case No.119/2006 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Rape Allegation.

The appellant, Ravindra Yogiraj Paul, was convicted by the Special Judge (Atrocity Case) for offences under Sections 376, 363, and 506 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Based on Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 376 IPC, and medical evidence corroborated the rape.

The appellant, Vincent Fernandes, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for raping a 14-year-old girl on 31 March 1999 at Van...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 376, 341, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment of the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No.33 of 1996, convicting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 323 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Santosh Deelip Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, for offenses under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian...