Search Results for "Ransom"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Ransom Demand Under Sections 363, 364A, 120B IPC — Appellant Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Abducting Minor Son of Factory Owner and Demanding Rs. 1 Lakh Ransom.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammed Mosin Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 363, 364A r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 363, 365 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant shared common intention with co-accused to kidnap the minor victim.

The appellant, Salim Abbas Chaudhari, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Kidnapping for Ransom Case, Acquitting One Accused of Conspiracy. The court upheld the conviction of other appellants under Sections 364A and 120B IPC but acquitted Kanhaiya Lal due to lack of evidence proving his involvement in the criminal conspiracy.

The case involved an appeal against the High Court's judgment that dismissed appeals by six convicts, including Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam and others,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Articles Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 386 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364, 342, 386, 506(2) IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Amitabh @ Amit @ Rana Sameer Roy, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay in Sessions Case No. 893 of 1994 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court held that Section 308(7) BNS requires specific intent to cause death, which was absent as injuries were simple and on non-vital parts.

The applicants, Vikas Rajput and Dilip Gavit, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Filing FIR. Court Held That Absence of Grievous Injuries and Delay in FIR Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The applicants, Ankush Singh and Jatin Patel, filed a bail application under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 0039 of 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act. Search Conducted Without Informing Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Rendering Recovery Illegal.

The applicant, Dhanji Dubriya, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection with F...