Search Results for "Railways contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Railways contract"

309 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Arbitral Award Upholding Initialled Joint Executing Agreement as Valid Arbitration Agreement. Initialling and Conduct Found to Evidence Mutual Assent, Establishing Binding Contract Under Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a consortium formed by M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (M3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Cancellation of Dharavi Redevelopment Tender and Upholds Fresh Tender Process. The court held that the State's decision to cancel the earlier tender and re-tender was a policy decision based on changed circumstances and not arbitrary, and that the petitioner had no vested right to the award of the contract.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, SecLink Technologies Corporation, a company incorporated in Seychelles and lead member of a consortium, challenged the cancellation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Authority Orders — Petitioner Failed to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The Court upheld the Authority's orders directing payment of minimum wages to contract labour under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

7 Nov 2023

The petitioner, A2Z Infraservices Ltd., filed four writ petitions (WP No. 972 of 2019, WP No. 973 of 2019, WP No. 974 of 2019, and WP No. 975 of 2019)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.

4 May 2018

These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement are arbitrable and that interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when the agreement itself provides for termination and the petitioner has an adequate remedy under the arbitration clause.

2 May 2017

The petitioner, B.E. Billimoria & Company Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an injunctio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

20 Feb 2015

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award of Compensation for Underutilization of Resources Due to Railway's Delays.

23 Dec 2005

The Union of India, representing the South-East-Central Railway, appealed against an order of the District Judge, Nagpur, refusing to set aside an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Cotton Contracts Despite Minor Omissions in Contract Notes; Substantial Compliance with By-laws Sufficient under Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932. Omission to fill blanks relating to measurements and settlement rate difference does not render contracts void if trade practice supports substantial compliance.

31 Mar 1958

The dispute arose from cotton transactions between the appellants and the respondent, both members of the East India Cotton Association Ltd. The appel...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)