Search Results for "Punjab Industrial Tribunal"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Dismissed Bus Conductor in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's finding that punishment of dismissal was proportionate to misconduct of ticket irregularities upheld as not shockingly disproportionate.

The petitioner, Shivaji Daulat Dadar, was employed as a Bus Conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 1989. On 13 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Full Back Wages Awarded for Flawed Inquiry. Syndicate Bank's Dismissal of Clerk for Alleged Misconduct Set Aside as Inquiry Was Vitiated by Bias and Non-Supply of Documents.

The petitioner, Syndicate Bank, a nationalised bank, challenged the Part-I Award dated 28.5.2003 and Part-II Award dated 7.9.2010 passed by the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Orders in Newspaper Employee Reinstatement Cases — Held that Workmen are Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages for Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Lokmat Media Private Limited (formerly Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited) challenging orders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MTNL's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Casual Labourer for Violation of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act. Termination Without Notice or Compensation Renders Retrenchment Illegal, and MTNL is an Industry Under Section 2(j).

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT) No. II, Mumbai, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Award of Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Involved in Factory Altercation. The court held that the domestic enquiry was fair and the compensation of 30 months' wages was appropriate under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petition was filed by the Rayon Workers' Union and the workman, Dinesh Pratap Singh, challenging the award of the 4th Labour Court at Thane in Ref...