Search Results for "Public Provident Fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Public Provident Fund"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Retired Employees in Pension Scheme Dispute, Upholding State's Authority to Repeal Welfare Measure with Cut-off Date. Denial of Pensionary Benefits Under Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Scheme, 1999, After Repeal on 02.12.2004, is Valid as It Does Not Alter Accrued Rights Under Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1995.

16 Apr 2025

The dispute involved three retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, a state-owned entity, who filed a pe...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

22 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SSD Fund Employees for Pensionary Benefits Under 6th CPC — Holds That Long-Term Employment with Government Control and Parity with Regular Employees Confers Status of Government Servants. The Court found that denial of benefits to SSD Fund staff while granting them to other SFF personnel performing similar duties violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

21 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by six employees (Rajkaran Singh, Jagat Ram Joshi, Vishu Dutt Tripathi, HK Naithani, Shiv Kumar, and Surat ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Forum's Order in Favor of Construction Worker in Welfare Scheme Dispute. Token Contribution Under BOCW Act Constitutes Consideration, Making Worker a 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

27 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated an appeal concerning whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institution Challenging Provident Fund Applicability. Establishment Not Exempt Under Section 16(1)(a) or (b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as It Uses Power and Employs More Than 20 Persons.

11 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Aniket College of Social Work, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trust...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. Against Provident Fund Commissioner's Order — Contractors' Employees Held Entitled to Provident Fund Benefits Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Principal Employer Cannot Escape Liability for Provident Fund Contributions of Contractor's Employees Under Section 2(f) of EPF Act.

25 Mar 2015

The appellant, Goa Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., a government corporation registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in promoting touri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Trade Union in Provident Fund Coverage Dispute — Factory Held Not a Branch of Trading Firm Under Section 2A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Common ownership and consolidation of accounts insufficient to treat two separate establishments as one integral unit for PF coverage.

3 Feb 2010

The appellant, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Receiver in Family Property Dispute. Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case for Receiver When Property is in Possession of Defendants and Alternative Remedy of Partition is Available.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, filed a suit for partition and accounts against his family members, including his mother, brothers, sisters...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)