Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Challenge by Caveator Claiming Earlier Will. Court Upholds Validity of Later Will Executed in Hospital, Finds No Suspicious Circumstances.

The case concerns a probate petition filed by Prakash Sunderdas Aswani, the sole executor named in the last Will of Pushpa Thakurdas Aswani dated 18th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Heirship Certificate Granted Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Non-Joinder of Other Legal Heirs. The court held that an heirship certificate obtained by suppressing the existence of other legal heirs is liable to be revoked.

The petitioners, being the widow, daughter, minor son, and mother of the deceased Bhimrao Anand Jadhav, filed a petition seeking revocation of an heir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Under Rule 133 for Delay in Seeking Adjournment to Judge — Security Order Already Set Aside by Higher Courts. Application Filed Beyond Four-Day Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause Under Rule 133 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.

The applicant, Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja, the original plaintiff in Suit No.3190 of 2006, filed an application under Rule 133 of the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Order Allowing Production of Additional Documents in RAE&R Suit. Court Held That Mere Production of Documents Without Ruling on Admissibility Does Not Cause Prejudice to Petitioners.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 1 August 2022 passed by the learned Judge, Small Causes Cour...