Search Results for "Private Temple Declaration"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in HR & CE Act Case — Bagyammal Trust Held to be a Specific Endowment. Deed of Settlement dated 4 June 1926 created a public charitable trust for temple purposes, falling under Section 6(19) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madras High Court which reversed the trial court's decree in favor of the appellant. The appellant, W. N. Alla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Temple Land Dispute Over Alagar Hills Reserved Forest. The Court held that the notification under Section 25 of the Madras Forest Act, 1882 was valid and the temple failed to prove title over the forest area.

The dispute pertained to the ownership of Alagar Hills, a forest area in Tamil Nadu. The temple, Arulmighu Kallalagar Thirukoil, and its devotees file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Orders in Newspaper Employee Reinstatement Cases — Held that Workmen are Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages for Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Lokmat Media Private Limited (formerly Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited) challenging orders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Dispute. Court holds that Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC requires the plaint to be read as a whole and the defence cannot be considered for deciding whether the suit is barred by law.

The petitioners, original defendants, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order dated 26.04.2011 passed by the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...