Search Results for "Plaint averments"

1953 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1953 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit Challenging 1973 Sale Deeds. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation is Mixed Question of Fact and Law Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (applicants) in Regular Civil Suit No.140 of 2022, challenging the order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit Alleging Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Family Property by Father. Limitation Period Under Section 109 of Limitation Act, 1963 Raised as Defence.

The matter arises from an Interim Application filed by Defendant No.1, Mantri Building Condominium, seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint Against Directors in Commercial Suit -- No Cause of Action Against Nominee Director and Other Directors -- Corporate Personality Principle Upheld

The Bombay High Court allowed Notices of Motion filed by Defendant Nos. 3 to 8 seeking rejection of the Plaint -- The Plaintiff had sued Defendants an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Plea in Suit for Recovery and Declaration. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed against orders passed by the trial court rejecting applications under Order 7 Rule 11 o...