Search Results for "Pensionary Benefits"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Government Employee Status of SSD Fund Managers. Temporary Employment Without Government Recruitment Process Denies Pension Benefits.

The Supreme Court of India upheld a Delhi High Court judgment denying pension and other benefits under the 6th Central Pay Commission (CPC) to employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Rules on Pensionary Benefits for Retired Chief Information Commissioner. Court deliberates on the entitlement of pension, gratuity, and related benefits for the retired Chief Information Commissioner.

The Bombay High Court at Goa delivered its judgment on the writ petition filed by Shri Prashant S. P. Tendolkar, a retired Chief Information Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Employees in Goa Win Case for Pay Parity with Mumbai Counterparts. Bombay High Court Upholds Chief Justice's Recommendations, Directs Goa Government to Implement Upgraded Pay Scales

The High Court of Bombay at Goa has ruled in favor of the petitioners, who are Group 'A' employees and Section Officers at the High Court, by directin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal by State Against Acquittal in Sudesh Patil and Manoj Waghela Corruption Case. The State of Maharashtra appeals against the acquittal of Sudesh Patil and the conviction of Manoj Waghela in a bribery case involving pension payments.

This is a judgment concerning two criminal appeals stemming from the same case. The State of Maharashtra has appealed the acquittal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Employee Gratuity Payout Deferred Pending Appeal Conclusion. Court rules that gratuity is payable only after final judicial orders, including appeals, are issued under Maharashtra Civil Services Pension Rules.

This case deals with the entitlement of a State Government employee to receive gratuity upon the conclusion of judicial proceedings under Rule 130(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Restores Pension Benefits After 27-Year Increment Mistake. Petitioner secures favorable ruling on pension recalculations and additional benefits after wrongful withdrawal of increments granted for past service.

The petitioner, a Junior Hindi Stenographer, was employed with the Madhya Pradesh Government from 1977 to 1985 and later joined the respondent employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of University Employee's Pension Benefits After 33 Years of Service. Petitioner's Continuous Service Recognized, University and State Directed to Process Pension Promptly

The Petitioner, after 33 years of service with Savitribai Phule Pune University, was denied pensionary benefits and filed a Writ Petition. The Petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Decision on Superannuation Date and Pension Benefits. Court Clarifies Superannuation Date and Post-Retirement Benefits under MEPS Rules and 7th Pay Commission

The superannuation date of a petitioner, born on 01.01.1958, who claims entitlement to benefits under the 7th Pay Commission. The petitioner asserts h...