Search Results for "Pensionary Benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Pensionary Benefits"

433 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Retired High Court Judges for Full Pension Including District Judiciary Service. Services Rendered as District Judges Must Be Counted for Full Pension Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court in this suo motu writ petition and connected matters addressed multiple issues concerning pension and other retirement benefits paya...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Succession Certificate Dispute — Widow Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Under Rule 116(6)(a) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Court holds that a Succession Certificate is not required for claiming pension and that the widow's right to pension is governed by service rules, not succession law.

19 Dec 2017

The case involves a dispute over pensionary benefits of a deceased government employee, Rushi Meshram, who worked with Zilla Parishad, Aheri and died ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Treating Suspension Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. The Court held that under Rules 37 and 50 of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993, an employee compulsorily retired is entitled to have the suspension period counted as qualifying service for pension.

4 Feb 2014

The respondent, J.S. Kharat, was employed by the Central Railway since 1964 as a Driver 'C'. On 25.12.1985, he was placed under suspension due to invo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

28 May 2020

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Daily Wager Converted to Temporary Employee — Half of Pre-Regularization Service Counted as Qualifying Service Under Office Memorandum Dated 1st May, 1987. The court held that the petitioner, who served as a daily wager for 18 years and then as a temporary employee for 15 years, is entitled to pension with half of the daily wage period counted as qualifying service, as he was deemed to have opted for the pension scheme under the 4th Central Pay Commission recommendations.

15 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Raman Ganda, was appointed as a daily wager in the Water Supply Department of the Union Territory of Daman and Diu in 1969. He worked ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

3 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Pension Dispute, Holding Resignation Forfeits Past Service. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Rules Came Into Force Not Entitled to Pensionary Benefits Despite Completing 22 Years of Service.

5 Dec 2019

The case involves an appeal by BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. against a Delhi High Court judgment granting pensionary benefits to the first respondent, Ghansh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Family Pension in Deemed Confirmation Case. Husband Deemed Confirmed Under Rule 26(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 Despite Death During Extended Probation.

24 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Nita Bhagwan Ware, is the widow of Bhagwan Ware, who was appointed as an Assistant Teacher (Shikshan Sevak) on 1 July 2009. He died on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired KVIC Employee Challenging Withdrawal of Pension and Recovery of Paid Pension. Pension is a Right, Not a Bounty, and Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Statutory Authority Under Regulation 15 of KVIC Employees Pension Regulations 1984.

8 Sep 2015

The petitioner, A.K. Kumaran Nair, joined the U.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board on 15 June 1982. The Board was taken over by the Khadi and Villa...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)