Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 1961"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Regarding Disability Pension for Ex-Serviceman with Psychiatric Disability. Petitioner Contends Medical Board's Opinion on Aggravation by Military Service Is Conclusive Under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Regulation 186(2).

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, an ex-sepoy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the orders ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Order Denying Disability Pension to Soldier Discharged on Medical Ground of Schizophrenia. Court Holds Petitioner Not Entitled to Disability Pension as Disability is Neither Attributable to Nor Aggravated by Military Service Under Rule 173 of Pension Regulation for Army 1961.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Ex-No.15429601-N Sepoy Valthati Sikhamani, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 28.09.2009 and was invalidated out from service on 22.06...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Widow and Children for Family Pension Despite Bigamous Marriage — Second Marriage Valid After Divorce from First Wife, Entitlement to Pensionary Benefits Upheld. The court held that the marriage of appellant No.1 with the deceased, though void at inception due to subsistence of earlier marriage, became valid after the divorce of the first wife, and the appellants are entitled to family pension under the Army Pension Regulations.

22 Aug 2023

The case pertains to a dispute over family pension of Late Subedar Pundalik Bhave, who served in the Indian Army. The appellants are Smt. Shiramabai (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Havildar's Claim for Ex-Gratia Compensation in Army Disability Case. Discharge During Extended Tenure Under Annexure B Conditions Does Not Qualify as Invalidation for Ex-Gratia Purposes Under Policy Circular Dated 26 December 2011.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, a former Havildar in the Indian Army, completed his original tenure of 24 years on 27 December 2010 and was granted a two-year extensio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.

14 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande, joined the Indian Army as a Sepoy-Driver on 4th February 1981 and was posted in difficult terrains in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)