Search Results for "Pension Regulations 2008"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Ex-Servicemen's Claims for Full Disability Pension Arrears -- Union of India & Ors. Appeal Dismissed -- Judgment in Rem Overrides Limitation Periods for Recurring Pension Rights Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning arrears of disability pension for ex-servicemen -- The central issue was whether arrears...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court examines challenge by Union of India to Armed Forces Tribunal order granting disability pension under new Army Pension Regulations, 2008. Tribunal had relied on Dharamvir Singh precedent under old regulations; court analyses attributability and onus of proof under new scheme.

The Madras High Court heard a writ petition filed by the Union of India under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order of the Armed F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Writ of Certiorari Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Order Granting Disability Pension Under Pension Regulations. Union of India Argues That Post-2008 Regulations Remove Presumptions, and Dharamvir Singh Decision Based on Old Rules Is Inapplicable.

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Defence, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Job Contract Pension Case — Sets Aside High Court Order Counting Entire Service for Pension. Only limited job-contract service sufficient to render eligibility for pension can be counted under Rule 18(6) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of appeals filed by the State of Odisha challenging the orders of the Orissa High Court that had dismissed the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Raghavendra Anantrai Mehta, a retired District and Sessions Judge who retired on 30th September 1991, filed a writ petition under Arti...