Search Results for "Patent Illegality"

693 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 693 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appellant's Letters Patent Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Single Judge's Order. Delay Condonation Denied as Unexplained; Appeals Found Devoid of Merit on Substance.

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Vasharambhai Sagharambhai Bharvad against a common judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cooperative Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Municipal Road. Land Reserved for Road in Development Plan Cannot Be Used for Other Purposes Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The appellant, Ambernath Sahakari Samudayik Shetki Society Limited, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the dismissal of its writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...