Search Results for "Order VII Rule 11"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Plaint Rejection Case Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on Limitation Grounds. Suit for Declaration of Will and Codicil as Null and Void Held Barred by Limitation Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963, as Right to Sue First Accrued on Date of Will Execution.

The dispute involved a civil suit filed by the plaintiff, son of deceased Pramod Kesurdas Sanghavi, against his sisters and a nephew as defendants, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Affirmed Maintainability of Suit for Negative Declaration of Marital Status

Declaration of Legal Character – Suit Seeking Negative Declaration – Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Jurisdiction of Civil Courts ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The Court Held That the Plaintiff Deserved an Opportunity to Adduce Evidence, and the Rejection of the Plaint Could Not Be Sustained Solely on the Ground of Absence of a Clear Right to Sue.

Bombay High Court Dismissed Civil Revision Application of Applicant Challenging Rejection of Application for Plaint Rejection. The Court held that a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Rejection of Plaint – Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) – Limitation and Cause of Action – Requirement of Evidence at Trial.

The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s decision, stating that the issues of limitation and cause of action required detailed examination through ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds HUDCO in Breach of Contractual Obligations, Orders Refund of Forfeited Amount to Tomorrowland Limited. Forum Shopping and Unclean Hands Doctrine Bar Interest on Refund – Appeal Partly Allowed

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that HUDCO was in breach of its contractual obligations and ordered a refund of the principal amo...