Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "No-confidence motion"

105 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President Despite Pending Disqualification Proceedings. No Statutory Bar Exists Under Section 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 for Moving No-Confidence Motion During Pendency of Disqualification Proceedings.

13 Jun 2024

The appellant, P. Reethi Mune Gowda, was the President of Bagaluru Grama Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by several members of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat Samiti Party Leadership Dispute Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act. District Collector's Approval of New Party Leader Upheld as Valid Based on Majority Resolution and Definition of Panchayat Samiti Party Under Section 2(l).

1 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the removal of the appellant as Party Leader (Gatneta) of the INCPS Party, a Panchayat Samiti party formed by members elected o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Zila Panchayat No-Confidence Motion Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Secrecy of Ballot Waiver Issue. The Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the no-confidence motion solely on the ground of violation of secrecy of ballot without considering the principle of voluntary waiver by voters.

19 Jun 2020

The case arises from a no-confidence motion moved against the Adhyaksha (Chairperson) of the Zila Panchayat, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Sixty-four out ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch — Procedural Irregularities Not Sufficient to Invalidate Motion Passed by Majority. The court held that the no-confidence motion passed by a majority of 9 out of 13 members was valid under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not vitiate the motion.

22 Nov 2016

The petitioners, 13 ex-members of the Grampanchayat of Rukadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councillors Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act for Defection — No-Confidence Motion Against Mayor Not a 'Split' Under Tenth Schedule Analogous Provisions.

11 Apr 2016

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by councillors of the Akola Municipal Corporation challenging their disqualification by the Divisional ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Pre-Deposit Under Section 35(3-B) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Held Mandatory for Entertaining Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion.

19 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Gulab Pandu Chavan, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Chidgiri, Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. A no-confidence motion was initiated against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes the date of receipt of the notice, validating the special meeting held on the seventh day.

5 Nov 2014

The case pertains to a no-confidence motion moved against the Sarpanch of Belgaon-Kelgaon Gram Panchayat. The petitioners, six out of nine members, su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Mayor in Municipal Law Case — Motion Valid as No Disqualification Proceedings Were Pending at Time of Notice. The court held that a councillor who signed the no-confidence notice was not disqualified under the Maharashtra Local Authorities Members (Disqualification) Act, 1986, as the disqualification petition was filed after the notice, and the motion procedure under Section 55A of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 was valid.

7 May 2014

The petitioner, Sanjay Sudhakar Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion passed against the Mayor of Dhule Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Vice President of Municipal Council. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of councilors and the petitioner failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Nilesh Babarao Thombare, was the Vice President of the Municipal Council, Hinganghat. He filed a writ petition challenging the no-conf...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)