Search Results for "Model employer principle"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Failure to Provide Reasoned Decision and Non-Consideration of Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court, Nashik, dated 30 November 2024, which dismissed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Contractual Employees Against Municipal Corporation for Regularization and Equal Pay. Court Holds That Long-Term Contractual Workers Are Entitled to Consideration for Regularization Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractual employees of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation seeking regularization of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Government's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Temporary Employees in Government Hospitals. Back Door Entry Without Selection Process Disqualifies Claim for Regularisation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The State Government filed eight petitions challenging a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Satara, which had directed continuation of services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee Dismissed for Theft of Drill Bits - Labour Court Award of Full Back Wages Restored. Employer's Disciplinary Proceedings Found Vitiated Due to Denial of Fair Opportunity and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses.

The appellant, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court which dismissed its writ petiti...