Search Results for "Mixed Use Premises"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After 30 Years in Property Suit — No Prejudice as Trial Not Commenced. Pre-Trial Amendment Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay, as No New Cause of Action Introduced.

The present writ petition arises out of a civil suit filed in 1993 by the original plaintiffs, Smt. Bertha Carvalho and Shri Ross Carvalho, against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Deemed Sanction Case. Failure to Communicate Refusal Within 60 Days Under Section 337 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Results in Deemed Approval of Building Plans.

The case involves a dispute between the Appellant and Respondent, now deceased, represented by legal representatives) regarding deemed sanction of bui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Food Safety Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors cannot be held liable under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The petitioners, including a company and its erstwhile directors, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, which dismissed their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rent Control Matter — Suit Not Barred Under Karnataka Rent Act. Tenant's Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Rejected as Suit for Ejectment is Maintainable Before Small Causes Court.

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the tenant-defendant (petitioner) challenging the order dated 07.03.2023 passed by the XVII Ad...