Search Results for "Majority rule"

2297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Vice-President for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Failure to allow the petitioner to speak and absence of proper proposal and seconding rendered the motion invalid.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gabhane, was the Vice-President of Nagar Panchayat, Mohadi, elected on 19.01.2022. On 20.12.2022, nine elected councillors su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Standing Committee Election in Sangli Municipal Corporation Due to Invalid Nomination Process. Single Nomination for Mayor's Post Invalidates Election of Standing Committee Members Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioner, a councillor of the Sangli-Miraj & Kupwad Municipal Corporation, challenged the election of the Standing Committee held on 31.8.2012. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...