Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act 1999"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court directs respondents to issue notice to project affected persons before denying rehabilitation benefits.

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased project affected person, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to issue a notice unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Barred by Delay and Laches in Project Affected Person Employment Case. Claim for Reinstatement Rejected After 27-Year Delay from Denial Letters.

The petitioner, Shri Uday Laxman Pawar, claiming to be a Project Affected Person (PAP), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.

The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.

The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application to Modify Final Judgment in Bhama Askhed Project Land Acquisition Case. No Ground Made Out for Extension of Time for Issuance of Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Affected Persons Act, 1999.

The State of Maharashtra filed a Civil Application seeking modification of a final judgment dated 17 July 2012 passed by a Division Bench of the Bomba...