Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

553 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 553 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Authority Failed to Consider Acquittals and Pending Cases, Leading to Non-Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Paramjitsingh @ Jentil Sardar Lohiya, challenged an externment order dated 11.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Default Bail Plea Against Custody Extension Under Organised Crime Act. Statutory Bail Application Ignored; Extension Sought Beyond 90 Days Violates Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, an accused in a murder case under the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000, filed a writ petition challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Custodial Death Due to Police Negligence — State Held Vicariously Liable Under Article 21 of the Constitution for Failure to Provide Medical Aid to Person in Custody.

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar s/o Kachru Todmal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking compensation for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of State Order Transferring Idol Theft Cases to CBI. Court holds that transfer of investigation without consulting the investigating officer and without court's approval was improper.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the Madras High Court's judgment dated 30.11.2018, which quashed the State Government's order dated 01.08.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...