Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Secretary of Agriculture Produce Market Committee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Violative of Section 44(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Principles of Natural Justice.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Deorao S/o Bhujangrao Fuke, was serving as the Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Majalgaon, District Beed....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notifications Requiring Licenses for Hamals and Transporters in APMCs Under APMC Act. The Court held that the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 does not empower the State to require licenses for hamals and transporters, and upheld the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act, 2021.

29 Jun 2021

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various transport companies, hamal unions, and cooperative societies challenging Government R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC as Previous Consultation with State Agricultural Marketing Board Not Validly Conducted. The requirement of 'previous consultation' under Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 was not satisfied as the consultation was held only with the Board's office bearers instead of the full Board.

9 Apr 2013

Fifteen directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

20 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition by Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Appointment of Junior Clerks by Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies — Appointment of Employees by Registrar Under Section 27 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Valid Despite Committee's Objections.

6 Jan 2010

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Udgir, through its Chairman, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondents No. 2, 3 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Supersession Under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Show Cause Notice Requirement.

14 Jan 2019

The petitioners, who were members of the Umrane Agricultural Produce Market Committee, challenged the order of supersession of the committee passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Levy of Market Fee on Cardamom by Agricultural Produce Market Committee — Cardamom Held to be Plantation Crop Not Agricultural Produce Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Market (Regulation) Act, 1963. The court held that the Spices Board Act, 1986 (Central Act) prevails over the State Act and cardamom cannot be subjected to market fee.

23 Jun 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Mohanlal Keshavlal & Co., a wholesale trader in cardamom, filed a writ petition challenging the levy of market fee by the Agricul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Elections to Market Committee Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Notification Requirement. Court holds that elections cannot be ordered until State Government issues notification under Section 13(1B) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963, specifying number of members and reserved categories.

19 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Shekhar Ramchandra Badade, claiming to be an agriculturist and member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Neera, filed a wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Resolves Conflict on Cessation of APMC Membership Under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Members Elected by Managing Committees of Cooperative Societies or Village Panchayats Cease to Be APMC Members Upon Losing Membership in the Parent Body.

24 Feb 2021

The case involves a reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur to resolve conflicting Division Bench decisions on the interpretati...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)