Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Punishment Without Enquiry Invalid. Failure to Conduct Departmental Enquiry Before Placing Employee at End of Waiting List for Habitual Absence Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the employer, State Transport Co-operative Bank Limited and its Branch Manager, challenging the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court’s Recognition of Trade Union Under MRTU & PULP Act. Recognition Granted Based on Retrospective Membership Payments Raises Question of Legal Validity.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 3 March 1998 of the Industrial Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Seeking Impleadment in Union Recognition Proceedings — Employee's Resignation from Union Does Not Confer Locus Standi to Intervene in Recognition Application Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shri Gireesh U.G. Menon, was an employee of M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co. and a former member of the Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha (Respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Employer to Bear Advocate Costs for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 — Held that Industrial Court exceeded jurisdiction by imposing financial burden on employer without legal basis.

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, in Revision App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Disproportionate Punishment. Industrial Court's Power to Interfere with Punishment Under MRTU and PULP Act Upheld — Permanent Stoppage of Increments for Outraging Modesty Found Disproportionate.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, which had set aside the punishment of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Finding That Employee Is a Workman Under MRTU & PULP Act. Termination Without Enquiry Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which dismissed its revision applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Provide Facilities to Recognised Union Under MRTU and PULP Act. Recognised Union Entitled to Same Facilities as Unrecognised Union Under Section 20 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, challenged an order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 919 of 2001. The respo...