Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Petitioner Due to Lack of Public Order Threat and Improper Use of Antecedents -- Fundamental Rights Upheld in Preventive Detention Case

The petitioner challenged a detention order dated 13.10.2025 passed under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act, arguing it violated his fundamental rights und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status and Delay in Passing Order Showed Lack of Live Link.

The petitioner, Laxman Sharnappa Dindore, challenged a detention order dated 21/06/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...