Search Results for "MPDA Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MPDA Act"

257 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

7 May 2026

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

12 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. Preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was in judicial custody and did not independently verify in-camera statements.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Sandeep Govind Pawar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Preventive Detention Based on Three Criminal Cases Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Did Not Properly Assess 'Disturbed Area' Condition.

3 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Ajay Nandkishor Pasi, challenged his preventive detention order dated September 9, 2019, passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status and Delay in Passing Order Showed Lack of Live Link.

22 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Laxman Sharnappa Dindore, challenged a detention order dated 21/06/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)