Search Results for "MMDR Act"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Liquidators Challenging Benami Act Attachment Orders, Upholds NCLAT Ruling that IBC Authorities Lack Jurisdiction to Entertain Challenges to Benami Act Orders During Insolvency Proceedings

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by liquidators challenging provisional attachment orders issued under the Prohibition of Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Issued as Security — Endorsement on Cheque and Plaint Admission Confirm Security Purpose, No Legally Enforceable Debt Exists

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Directors and Managing Director of R.L. Steels & Energy Limited, quashing the criminal complaint un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Demand for 10% Bid Amount as DMF Contribution in Minor Mineral Mining Cases. Section 15 of MMDR Act Empowers State to Fix Contribution for Minor Minerals, Not Section 9B.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging demand notices requiring successful bidders for minor mineral mining to deposit 10% of the total bid a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mining Lease Recommendation Under Section 11(3) of Mines and Minerals Act. The Court upheld the Minister's recommendation for grant of mining lease to respondent no.3, finding no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularity.

The petitioner, M/s Veet Rag Homes Private Limited, challenged the order dated 25.4.2008 of the Minister (Industries & Mining) recommending grant of m...