Search Results for "Long term capital gains"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Typographical Error in Return Does Not Attract Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Bonafide belief and full disclosure of transaction negate mens rea for concealment.

The appellant, Ms. Saritha Jain, an income tax assessee, sold her shares in M/s. Vision Health Services (P) Ltd., an Indian company, to M/s. Perot Sys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Act Case Upholding Revisional Jurisdiction. Commissioner Validly Set Aside Assessment Order as Payment to Shareholders Was Not 'Cost of Improvement' Under Capital Gains Computation Under Sections 48 and 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment concerning the sale of a property named 'Paville House' by the respondent assessee, a company engaged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - Holding Period for Long-Term Capital Gains Determined by Section 2(42A) Explanation 1. Indexation Benefit Requires Asset Held for More Than 36 Months; Inherited Property's Holding Period Includes Previous Owner's Period.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the computation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue's View on Capital Gains Computation in Amalgamation Case. Assessee Not Entitled to Substitute Fair Market Value as on 1-1-1964 for Shares Acquired Under Sections 47 and 49 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Madhura Coats Ltd., arising f...