Search Results for "Loan recovery"

1144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Reduces Interest Rate from 23% to 6% p.a. for Money Lending Transactions. Court Held That Charging 23% Interest Was Unconscionable and Excessive Under Section 34 CPC, and Reduced It to 6% p.a. Simple Interest.

The plaintiff, G.R. Shet, proprietor of M/s Shet & Co., filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s Bawa Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Hand Loan of Rs.30 Lakhs Held Legally Enforceable Debt, Conviction Restored.

The original complainant, Smt. Sulekhabai Chowghule (since deceased, represented by her legal heir), filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...