Search Results for "Liability Ascertainment"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Motor Accident Compensation After Finding Tribunal Erred in Not Applying Multiplier Method. Award for 20% permanent disability increased by Rs.1,09,200 and interest at 7.5% per annum under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 166 and 168.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellant, a Sectional Engineer with the Public Works Department,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Injured Mason in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability Assessed at 100% for Leg Amputation. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 23.86 Lakhs to Rs. 33.13 Lakhs with 7.5% Interest Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, M. Paramesh, a 30-year-old mason, was severely injured in a road accident on 18.04.2017 when a lorry hit his bicycle on NH-7 near Anaip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Whether Registrar NCLT Can Scrutinize Maintainability of Section 95 IBC Petition at Filing Stage. Appeal Challenges Single Judge's Order Holding E-Filing of Insolvency Petition Against Partnership Firm Void and Non-Est.

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Manyata Reallty, a partnership firm, challenging the e-filing of a petition under Section 95 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Customs Duty Payable on Redemption of Confiscated Goods Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 — Interest Under Section 28AB Also Attracts. Redemption fine does not substitute duty; duty and interest are separate liabilities.

The Supreme Court adjudicated two questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962: whether customs duty is payable when confiscated goods are redeemed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...