Search Results for "Less restrictive measures"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Reimburse Fees for Backward Class Students in Private Unaided Schools - State's Obligation Under Article 21-A and RTE Act

The petitions raised questions about the liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to back...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensing Conditions on Orchestra Bars Under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Gender-Based Numerical Restrictions on Performers Held Valid as Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest Under Article 19(6) of the Constitution.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay that upheld conditions imposed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on orchestr...