Search Results for "Legislative Competence"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court's Interpretation of Article 131: Federal Disputes and Legal Rights. A detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 131, focusing on federalism, state consent, and the role of the CBI within Indian constitutional law.

The maintainability of a suit filed by the State of West Bengal against the Union of India under Article 131 of the Indian Constitution, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Stringent Provisions of MCOC Act, Denies Anticipatory Bail. Emphasizes Legislative Intent to Combat Organized Crime, Dismisses Reliance on SCST Act Precedents and Non-Binding Judgments

The judgment examines the applicability of anticipatory bail provisions under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOC Act) in comparison ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan’s Authority to Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies. Life Insurance Corporation of India’s Appeal Dismissed on Legislative Competence and Stamp Duty Compliance Grounds.

The Supreme Court of India ruled that the state of Rajasthan has the legislative competence to levy and collect stamp duty on insurance policies issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Multiple Candidature Provision in Election Law. Constitutional validity of Section 33(7) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 upheld as matter of legislative policy, not violating Articles 14 or 19.

The petitioner invoked the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 33(7)...