Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Contractual Dispute Under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Objections on Limitation and Existence of Dispute.

5 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/S Santech Engineers Pvt Ltd, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Hotel Management Dispute. Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Respondents from Interfering with Appellant's Management of Hotel Pending Arbitration.

14 Nov 2024

The appellant, Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Concil...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court allowed the petition after the petitioners paid stamp duty and penalty under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, curing the defect in the unstamped Hotel Management Agreement containing the arbitration clause.

25 Jan 2022

The petition was filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Intercontinental Hotels Group...

High Court

High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act — Petitioner's Request Granted as Disputes Fall Within Arbitration Clause. The court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in the contract agreement dated 12.02.2010 and the failure of the respondents to appoint an arbitrator justified the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...

High Court

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator After Respondents Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, entered into a contract agreement with the respondents, the South Western ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Parties Exclusively Agreed to Pune Courts Under Selling Agency Agreement Clause 8. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Prevents Bombay High Court from Entertaining Section 34 Petition Despite Respondent's Registered Office in Mumbai.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Unitech Texmech Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)