Search Results for "KIAD Act acquisition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "KIAD Act acquisition"

41 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Compensation Classification. Court holds that alternative remedy under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 is available and writ petition is not maintainable.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Smt. Prameelabai W/o. Bheemasa Habib (since deceased, represented by her LR Sri. Ganapati S/o. Bheemasa Habib), filed a writ petition ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that acquisition by KIADB for a private company is permissible under the KIADB Act, 1966, and the petition was barred by laches and alternative remedy.

29 Mar 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Hebbal Village, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant Bound by Voluntary Agreement Under Section 29(2) of KIAD Act, 1966. The court held that a statutory agreement under Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, once voluntarily entered into, bars the landowner from seeking enhancement of compensation through a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jan 2020

The appellant, Rangaswamy B M, was the owner of land acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (KIAD Act). A consent award w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Notifications Issued in 2005 Filed in 2019 Held Not Maintainable.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri B R Srinivas, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Officer's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.5,75,000 to Rs.8,00,000 per Acre Based on Comparable Sale Deed.

27 Oct 2016

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the Upper Krishna Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Ba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals of Landowners in KIADB Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied as Landowners Failed to Prove Higher Market Value. Landowners sought enhanced compensation for acquired lands but did not produce evidence of higher market value; court upheld Single Judge's dismissal.

29 Apr 2016

The case pertains to 16 landowners (appellants) whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for industrial de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged.

29 Apr 2016

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KIADB Land Acquisition Notification — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Title or Possession Over Disputed Land. The court held that the petitioner, a company, had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition as it was neither the owner nor in possession of the land, and the notification under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 was validly issued.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Engineering (Pvt) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

10 Dec 2014

The petitioners, 22 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Locus Standi in Land Acquisition Challenge Under KIAD Act. Appellant, not being a landowner or person interested, cannot challenge acquisition proceedings.

3 Sep 2014

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by Sri P K George Kutty against the dismissal of his writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)